State in Interest of Js

DECISION

¶ 1 E.D.L. (Father) appeals the juvenile court's January 23, 2012 adjudication order. We affirm.

T2 Father asserts that the juvenile court's colloquy was insufficient because it failed to fully inform him of the legal significance of reunification services, and that his admissions may be used against him in subsequent proceedings to terminate his parental rights.

¶ 3 Utah Code section 78A-6-311 provides that "[If, at the adjudication hearing, the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the allegations contained in the petition are true, it shall conduct a dispositional…