Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Bremen-Bowdon Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 26, 2019No. A18A1764PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goss, Judge.
We granted Sheryl Daniel's application for discretionary appeal to review the superior court's order which affirmed the decision of the Appellate Division of the State Board of Workers' Compensation to deny Daniel's claim for benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act (the "Act"). For the following reasons, we affirm.
The facts in this case are undisputed. At the time of the incident, Daniel was employed as a seamstress at Bremen-Bowdon Investment Company (the "Employer"). Daniel parked in a lot owned by the Employer, but in order to get to and from the parking lot she was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayor and Aldermen of Savannah v. StevensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- General Fire & Casualty Co. v. BellflowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Miles v. Brown Transport CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Rockwell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Hill v. Omni Hotel at CNN CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- FRETT v. STATE FARM EMPLOYEE WORKERS' COMPENSATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Sheryl Daniel v. Bremen-Bowdon Investment, Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
- Sheryl Daniel v. Bremen-Bowdon Investment, Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2021