Jones v. Watson
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
Defendants’ primary contention is that this Court’s holding in Lipe v. Javelin Tire Company, Inc., 96 Idaho 723, 536 P.2d 291 (1975), was neither a judicial repeal of nor an amendment to Idaho’s tolling statute, I.C. § 5-229. Citing cases from Washington, Arizona, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Alaska, New Mexico, Oregon, Oklahoma, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,1 *611defendants urge upon us that no appellate court in the western states has restricted a decision similar to our Lipe case to exclusively prospective application. What the Court does which I find most objectionable is amend Lipe to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Thompson v. HaganIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Dalton v. St. Luke's Catholic ChurchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.