Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Michael Dixon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1995No. 95-1040PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtContie, J., joined by Ryan, J.,

NELSON, J. (pp. 136-37), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Peter Michael Dixon (“Dixon”) appeals the district court’s imposition of a two-level enhancement for victim vulnerability pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1. We vacate Dixon’s sentence and remand this action to the district court for resentencing for the following reasons.

I

On October 6, 1993, a federal grand jury charged defendant-appellant Dixon with “pass[ing], utter[ing] and publishing] as true a Treasury Cheek of the United States bearing the falsely made and forged endorsement ‘Cecil Brown’” in violation of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael E. YountCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Major Junior WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. unempl.ins.rep. (Cch) P 14279b United States of America v. Horace A. Bondurant, A/K/A Robert Allan BondurantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Linda Gail Stamps RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Michael Lynn TribbleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Thomas O'LearCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Jonathan WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Peter Michael DixonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API