Legal Opinion
Mayor of Baltimore v. Seabolt
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 6, 1956No. [No. 126, October Term, 1955.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrune, C. J.
This is an appeal by the City of Baltimore and by intervening property owners from a declaratory decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City passed in a suit instituted by the appellees determining that the Zoning Ordinance of that City is “invalid, ineffective and unenforceable insofar as it attempts to restrict to residential use only” a tract of land owned by the appellees.
The appellees, Seabolt and Suhr, co-partners, trading as Roland Investment Company (sometimes referred to below as “Roland Investment”), are the owners of the tract in question which is about two acres in area…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Offutt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Ellicott v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Oursler v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Insurance Commissioner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Poe v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- MacKe Co. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.