Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allifi v. Raider

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2013No. A13A0758; A13A0759Published

1ConcurrenceRay, Judge

I concur with the majority’s holding because I agree that Raider could not demonstrate that he was entitled to relief from the trial court’s order denying his petition for legitimation under OCGA § 9-11-60. However, I write separately to note that the trial court’s ruling on Raider’s petition to legitimate has no effect on whether or not Raider is the legitimate father of T. R.

It is my opinion that if the form acknowledging paternity and legitimation was properly executed,6 Georgia law recognizes Raider as the legitimate father of T. R. despite the trial court’s rulings regarding Raider’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brine v. ShippSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Barland Company v. Bartow County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Sauls v. AtchisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API