Legal Opinion

Kein v. . Tupper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1873PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is conceded that the loss occasioned by the fire must fall upon the party who, at the time, had the legal title to the cotton; and such is the well settled rule. (8 N.Y., 291.)

The contract of sale and purchase did not pass the title. When anything remains to be done by the seller to ascertain the identity, quantity or quality of the property, no title passes. (5 Den., 379; 25 N.Y., 525, and cases there cited.)

Assuming that this was a sale of a quantity of specific cotton, which I think we may do, and which is the most favorable view for the plaintiffs, yet, as the cotton was to be weighed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Olyphant v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Baker v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Joyce v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Olyphant v. McNairNew York Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cooke v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Portfolio v. . RubinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Burrows v. . WhitakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. State v. HughesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hayes v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API