Legal Opinion

Otto Guardado v. Diana Guardado

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 9, 2021No. 53636-6Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two February 9, 2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II OTTO GUARDADO, No. 53636-6-II Appellant, v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION DIANA GUARDADO, an individual; MARK and MICHELLE TAYLOR, husband and wife, and their marital community; JAMES KIMBALL, dba REALTY PRO, INC., Respondents. SUTTON, A.C.J. — Otto Guardado appeals the Clark County Superior Court order dismissing his RAP 12.8 restitution and unjust enrichment claims against Realty Pro, Inc. In June 2016, the Skamania County Superior Court ordered the sale of Guardado’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API