Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 5, 1981No. 60443PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Clyde Bailey, Maria Venable and Eduardo Valenzuela appeal their burglary convictions, enumerating five errors. We affirm.

1. Appellants first contend the trial court erred by denying their motion to suppress all tangible evidence seized in a warrantless consent search of a residence, and all testimony concerning such evidence. However, the property seized was not introduced at trial and no objection was made to the admission of testimony relating to the seized property. “ ‘It is harmless error to overrule a motion to suppress evidence which is never introduced; furthermore,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Dingler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Depree v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Askea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Gunsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Overton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Dobbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API