Doll v. Louisville Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 64. — ACTION BY CHARLES B. DOLL AGAINST THE LOUISVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. Judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Wm. Rogers Clay,
Comm issioneb — Reversing.
Appellant, Charles B. Boll, instituted this action against the appellee, Louisville Railway Company, to recover damages for personal injury. The jury found for appellee. From the judgment based upon this finding this appeal is prosecuted. Appellant asks a reversal because of errors in the instructions, and because the court refused to submit to the jury the question of the incompetency of appellee’s motorman.
The evidence for appellant is to the effect that, on the occasion of the accident, he had stopped at a cottage on Barret…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1865
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cox's Administrator v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Herrick v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ross v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Paducah Traction Co. v. Walker's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Hopper v. Barren Fork Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.