Legal Opinion

In re Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 17, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1976. He was suspended for a period of one year by decision dated April 15, 1993 (Matter of Rosenberg, 192 AD2d 871) and has not applied for reinstatement.

*830Respondent has not answered or otherwise appeared in response to a petition of charges dated May 8, 1997, nor to a subsequent default judgment motion by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards. The petition and motion were personally served upon him. Petitioner has filed proof by affidavit of the facts constituting the alleged misconduct. Under such circumstances, we deem the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In Re PerezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API