Legal Opinion

Mancil v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1925No. 4 Div. 172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Defendant, appellant hero, was charged by indictment and convicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder. Comprehended in the indictment were the lesser charges of assault, assault and battery, and assault and battery with a weapon. As to these lesser offenses, the statute provides a rule of evidence which allows any person on trial for such offenses to give in evidence any opprobrious words or abusive language used by the person assaulted at or near the time of the assault, etc., and such evidence shall be good in extenuation or justification, as the jury may determine. Code 1923,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Kean v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Mancil v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API