Omura v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
HOWELL, Justice.
Pursuant to rule 101 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a majority of the justices who participated in our February 27, 1987 opinion have reconsidered that opinion, and after such reconsideration find that our opinion should be corrected to read as follows:
Lanny Royce Omura appeals the trial court’s order denying his writ of habeas corpus by which he sought to avoid extradition to the State of Utah. In his fourth point of error, appellant contends that the Dallas County Magistrates Act2 is unconstitutional. We hold that the Magistrates Act was not properly complied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte StaceyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- Daves v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Christian v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Gary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ex parte PardunCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.