State Ex Rel. St. Mary's Hospital v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The two questions presented on this appeal are : (1) Is an order by the Industrial Commission refusing to quash the duces tecum .provisions of a subpcena subject to review by certiorari f (2) Are the duces tecum provisions of a subpoena valid without a showing that the records demanded are material to the issues in a pending case ?
With relation to the first of these issues appellants urge that a witness, before he is required to produce books and papers, is entitled to have the determination of a court as to their relevancy and materiality. It is true that in general, in the interest of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. City of Augusta v. LosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Milwaukee Corrugating Co. v. FlaggeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Hyslop v. HyslopWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Cousins v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nashban Barrel & Container Co. v. G. G. Parsons Trucking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Czapiewski v. Milwaukee City Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Grzelak v. BertrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Quality Outfitters, Inc. v. RiskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.