Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. St. Mary's Hospital v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The two questions presented on this appeal are : (1) Is an order by the Industrial Commission refusing to quash the duces tecum .provisions of a subpcena subject to review by certiorari f (2) Are the duces tecum provisions of a subpoena valid without a showing that the records demanded are material to the issues in a pending case ?

With relation to the first of these issues appellants urge that a witness, before he is required to produce books and papers, is entitled to have the determination of a court as to their relevancy and materiality. It is true that in general, in the interest of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State ex rel. City of Augusta v. LosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Milwaukee Corrugating Co. v. FlaggeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hyslop v. HyslopWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Cousins v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nashban Barrel & Container Co. v. G. G. Parsons Trucking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Ex Rel. Czapiewski v. Milwaukee City Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Grzelak v. BertrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Quality Outfitters, Inc. v. RiskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API