Jones v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
1. The evidence shows that the officers entered a house where all the devices for operating a lottery were found, and that such devices clearly proved that the crime was in progress when the officers arrived. Then the operation ceased. The defendant was first seen by the officers in a room adjoining the room where the game was operated. This was the only evidence tending to connect her with the offense. This was insufficient. The mere presence of one where a crime is being committed without any further evidence to show participation in it, directly or indirectly, is insufficient upon which to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reese v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Pirkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sweat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Huncke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Rutland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Stovall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Demonia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.