Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 7, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing the determination of *717the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) and ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, employed by a temporary placement agency, was placed with a client as a receptionist. Claimant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChereshnevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of FontaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of TrellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of PalmitessoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GagrajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of TrippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re the Claim of RamjaiwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API