Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Brucker
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 19, 1958No. Nos. 14314-14319PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals by six former employees of the Department of the Army who were discharged as “security risks”, purportedly under the authority of the Act of August 26, 1950. *66264 Stat. 476, 5 U.S.C.A. § 22-1, as implemented by Executive Order 10450, 18 Fed.Reg. 2489 (1953), 5 U.S.C.A. § 631 note, and Army Special Regulation No. 620-220-1, dated December 18, 1953. Each employee sued in the District Court to have his discharge declared invalid. As to each employee the District Court granted the Government’s cross motion for summary judgment and dismissed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Peters v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1955
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Coleman v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Wilkinson v. Legal Services Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Universal Shipping Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Felix v. GovernmentDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.