Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. v. Rains

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 25, 1986No. 66872Published

1ConcurrenceBlackmar, Judge

I concur in the exposition of the legal principles governing the issuance of original remedial writs (Mo. Const., Art. Y, § 4.1), but see no reason to perpetuate the unwise and overexpansive pronouncements of State ex rel. Morasch v. Kimberlin, 654 S.W.2d 889 (Mo. banc 1983). I adhere to the views expressed in my Concurring Opinion in that case. Missouri courts, over the years, have exercised discretion in issuing original remedial writs, when persuaded that no other remedy is adequate. In so doing they have acted in accord with the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Morasch ignored…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Twiehaus v. AdolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Morasch v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. General Electric Co. v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. State, Missouri Department of Agriculture v. McHenrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Charterbank Springfield, N.A. v. DoneganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API