Legal Opinion
Reed v. Stanly
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Decided September 26, 1898No. 12,582PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On Demurrer to Bill of Review.
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
(orally). This is a bill of review, brought without leave of the court, for the purpose of obtaining a review of the final decree of this court in the case of the President and Trustees of Bowdoin College v. Merritt, rendered June 5, a.nd entered June 18, 1896 (75 Fed. 480), upon the ground that upon the face of the record there appear certain errors, which entitle the present complainants to have that decree set aside. To this bill the defendants have interposed a demurrer, upon the grounds, among others: (1) That there a,re no averments in the bill which show any error in the record; (2)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. HatchSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Chappell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Vance v. BurbankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reed v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Ramsey v. Curtis. Ramsey v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Copeland v. BruningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1900
- Derrisaw v. SchafferDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- Hudgens v. BaughDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1915