Legal Opinion

Steckel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Morris • Steckel (Claimant) petitions for review of the Order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the determination of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s Claim Petition. Claimant challenges the WCJ’s finding that he was a stationary employee and argues that the WCJ erred as a matter of law in determining that Claimant was not within the course and scope of his employment when he was injured in an automobile accident.

The facts surrounding Claimant’s automobile accident are summarized as follows. Claimant was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Jonathan Sheppard Stables v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Wachs v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Beaver & Casey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Classic Landscaping, Inc. v. WCAB (Ramos)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Tri Star Auto Group v. WCAB (Bortz)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API