Legal Opinion
Andrew Munger, et al. v. Matco Tools Corporation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 5, 2026No. 5:23-cv-00337Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ANDREW MUNGER, et al., ) CASE NO. 5:23-cv-00337 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE DAVID A. RUIZ ) v. ) ) MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs’ Amended Class Action Complaint (Amended Complaint) (R. 9) raises the following causes of action: (1) negligence, (2) breach of implied contract, (3) unjust enrichment, (4) negligence per se, and (5) declaratory judgment. Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. (R. 11). Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition and Defendant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.