Legal Opinion

Bartling v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1903No. 12,657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court for Cheyenne county. Action upon a recognizance forfeited in a criminal case. Tried below before Grimes, J. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

On December 5, 1900, the county attorney of Cheyenne county filed an information in the district court of that county against John Bartling in proper form, charging him with the crime of horse-stealing and of receiving stolen horses knowing the same to have been stolen. December 7, John Bartling and Henry Bartling personally appeared before the district court of Cheyenne county in open court, and entered into a recognizance in the sum of $2,000, containing the following conditions: “The condition of this recognizance is such that if the said John Bartling shall personally appear at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BenzionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Western Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State ex rel. J. L. Brandeis & Sons v. MelcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Morfeld v. HuddinNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Parrott v. WolcottNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API