Polley v. Shoemaker
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrodkey, J.
This is an action brought by Thomas C. and Alice Polley, against Hal G. and Carol J. Shoemaker to recover damages for the alleged conversion of personal property and the breach of the right to peaceable and quiet enjoyment of leased premises. At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence, the District Court sustained defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, and dismissed plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs have appealed, contending that the trial court erred in sustaining defendants’ motion for a directed verdict and in rejecting plaintiffs’ offer of proof concerning damages for conversion of property.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Bass v. Boetel & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Fox v. American Propane, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Jessen v. BlackardNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mason v. SchumacherNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Terra Western Corp. v. Berry & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Platte Valley Bank v. Tetra Financial Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Watson v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.