Legal Opinion

Tong v. Orr

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1909No. 6,305PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From St. Joseph Circuit Court; Walter A. Funk, Judge. Action by Joseph G. Orr, against Lucius G. Tong and another, as trustees. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Action by appellee to recover the reasonable value of services as an attorney at law. The case was tried by a jury, and a verdict and judgment had, in favor of appellee, *682for $1,100. Appellants moved for judgment on the answers to interrogatories and for a new trial, reserved exceptions to the adverse rulings on both motions, and, by assignments, bring the questions thus saved to this court for review.

1. The rules with regard to the effect of interrogatories as against a general verdict are well known. Those under consideration fail to show that the contract therein found embraced the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frazier v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lavenson v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cordes v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. EadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Southern, School Buildings, Inc. v. Loew Electric, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Mecartney v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. Radio Picture Show Partnership v. Exclusive International Pictures, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Danielson v. Elgin Salvage and Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API