Legal Opinion

Orent v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

On February 6, 1929, The Equitable Life Assurance Society issued to the plaintiff a $25,000 policy of life insurance in which his wife was named as beneficiary. The policy contained provisions for $250 monthly disability benefits, waiver of premiums, and payment of double indemnity. Seven actions by plaintiff to recover monthly disability benefits covering the period commencing May, 1938, and ending June, 1941, have been consolidated with an action , hy Equitable. The Society seeks in its action to set aside the disability and double indemnity *303provisions of the policy on the ground of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Queens County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. S. & E. Motor Hire Corp. v. New York Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donald Vella v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and the Equitable Group and Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Frad v. Columbian National Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Frad v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Orent v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API