Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors of Ontario County v. Water Power & Control Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The city of Rochester has petitioned the Water Power and Control Commission of the State to approve its project for an additional water supply and the acquiring of land therefor. The city plans to take Honeoye lake and creek, together, with uplands in Ontario county which will receive the drainage from one hundred and eighty-seven square miles. A dam eight hundred feet long and sixty feet high is to be built across Honeoye creek valley forming a reservoir having a water surface of twelve and a half square miles. This will entirely submerge Honeoye lake. Also, it is planned to utilize Mud or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. People Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Long Sault Development Co. v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. People Ex Rel. Burhans v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Islip v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Whalen v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. People v. Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API