Ochoa v. State

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

Appellant was indicted for the offense of burglary of a habitation. The State also alleged a prior conviction of aggravated robbery for enhancement purposes. Appellant elected to have the court assess punishment, and, after the jury found appellant guilty of burglary of a habitation, the court sentenced appellant to thirty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirm.

Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence; therefore, no recitation of the facts is necessary.

Appellant’s first ground of error is a complaint that the trial…