Legal Opinion

Oakley v. Department of Mental Health

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1983No. Docket 60738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In an original mandamus action, * 1 plaintiff, Bernadine Oakley, requests this Court to require defendants, Michigan Department of Mental Health and C. Patrick Babcock, to provide her with statutory supplemental and fringe benefits for a work-related injury.

The record reflects that plaintiff, who was employed as an attendant nurse at the Plymouth Center for Human Development, sustained injuries when assaulted by a patient on March 13, 1979. Approximately two weeks later, the Department of Mental Health (hereinafter department) voluntarily started paying plaintiff workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ward v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kewin v. Board of Education of the Melvindale-Northern Allen Park Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. SAN JOAQUIN CTY. CAL. v. DeweyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Barry v. Flint Fire DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Goodrich v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cogan v. CoganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Samuel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Schumacher v. TidswellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Michigan Professional Employees Society v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Oakley v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API