Legal Opinion
Pole v. Frame Chevrolet, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 12, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, based on theories of negligence, breach of warranty and strict products liability, the third-party defendant General Motors Corporation (hereinafter GM) appeals (1) as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), entered November 29, 1985, as denied its motion to preclude the plaintiff and the defendant third-party plaintiff Frame Chevrolet, Inc. (hereinafter Frame) from introducing evidence concerning item Nos. 9, 10 and 11 of GM’s demand for bills of particulars,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scott v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Moore v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Gausney v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Major v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferrigno v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Major v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Valentine v. Armor Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kadan v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Gross v. Edmer Sanitary Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.