Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Haas v. One 1965 Ford Automobile

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 23, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The state brought this in rem proceeding for the forfeiture of an automobile pursuant to ORS 167.-247, 471.660 and 471.665. The complaint alleged the statutory requisites that the automobile was used to transport marihuana with the knowledge of its operator, Gregory Peigion, who was subsequently convicted of criminal activity in drugs. The circuit court sustained the demurrer of Gregory and Jacob Peigion, the owner and lienholder of the automobile, respectively, and claimants herein, on the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. Judgment was entered accordingly and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. A 1963 Corvette AutomobileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API