Legal Opinion

Ryan v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 22, 2018No. SC 96599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, JUDGE

Charles Ryan appeals the motion court's judgment overruling his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. He alleges his plea was involuntary because counsel did not inform him of a change in the plea offer until just before the plea hearing, did not meet with him to discuss the case prior to the plea hearing, and put undue pressure on him to accept the plea offer. This Court affirms, finding the record conclusively refutes the claims made in Mr. Ryan's motion.

*153I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In August 2011, Mr. Ryan pled guilty to second-degree drug…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jeremiah Wilson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. CHRISTINA N. KNAPP, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Hector Montes v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Jacob T. Shepard v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Markell D. Jackson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API