Legal Opinion

Truan v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1914No. Nos. 18,409—(176)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The London Guarantee & Accident Co., Ltd., was summoned as garnishee in an action in the district court for St. Louis county, wherein defendant Kate Truan recovered judgment against the Kange Power Co. The disclosure was taken before Hughes, J., and plaintiff’s motion for judgment against the garnishee for the amount of her judgment was granted. Prom the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, the garnishee appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Appeal by the garnishee from a judgment adjudging a recovery against it in plaintiff’s favor.

The facts are undisputed. Those material are: On June 5, 1910, the garnishee issued a policy, agreeing to indemnify defendant against loss from liability imposed by law upon it for damages on account of bodily injuries accidentally suffered by any person or persons not employed by assured during the year following, to the extent of $5,000. The instrument contained the usual undertaking to defend, in assured’s name and behalf, suits brought against it for recoveries contemplated by the policy, payment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Bacon v. FelthousSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mahr v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API