Legal Opinion

In re Arensberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner commenced this proceeding charging respondents with advancing financial assistance to clients in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-103 (B) and Judiciary Law § 488 (2). The petition contains one charge of misconduct which alleged that in representing clients in personal injury actions, respondents improperly advanced funds to such clients. It was also alleged that the practice of making such advances continued despite a letter of caution issued to Arlington and Arensberg, as well as another member of their firm, in November 1984. DR 5-103 (B) states in pertinent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waldman v. WaldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. GuglielmoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  2. In re MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API