Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Pecsok
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 18, 1976No. C75-486PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
This case came for trial on the plaintiffs’, Benjamin and Francene Bishop’s, allegations that the defendant, William Pecsok, had denied them housing opportunities on the basis of race, thereby violating 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 3604 and 3617. Jurisdiction is properly invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(4), see, Jones v. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189 (1968), and 42 U.S.C. §§ 3612 and 3617.
The . Court, sitting without a jury, having heard the evidence of the witnesses, having examined the documentary evidence submitted by both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John W. Marr and Lucille Marr v. Douglas RifeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Jerome Seaton and Gladys Seaton, His Wife v. Sky Realty Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bennett Robinson v. 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., and Paul HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Christina A. Woods-Drake v. C. L. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Leo R. Fountila, Jr. v. Mary E. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. City of Parma, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Miller v. Apartments And Homes Of New Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.