Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walker v. Shondrick-Nau (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2016No. 2014-0803Published

1DissentPfeifer, J.

{¶ 23} The majority opinion is based on this court’s holding in Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, that the 1989 version of Ohio’s Dormant Mineral Act, former R.C. 5301.56, Sub.S.B. No. 223, 142 Ohio Laws, Part I, 981 (“1989 ODMA”) was not self-executing; I dissented from that holding, and I therefore dissent from the majority’s holding in this case. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 24} I would hold that by operation of the 1989 ODMA, John Noon’s interest was deemed abandoned and was reunited with the surface…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Thompson v. CusterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API