Legal Opinion

Ingles v. Hotze

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1942No. 30316PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The plaintiff, Veatrice Hotze, filed an action for false imprisonment against the defendants, George Ingles, and the sureties on his bond, Bessie Taylor, and J. T. McGraw. Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $200, from which the defendants have appealed. Three specifications of error are presented in the brief. The first one is that the evidence was not sufficient to, sustain the verdict and judgment.

The facts disclose that on or about the 12th day of August, 1939, at 11 o’clock p. m. the defendant George Ingles came upon the plaintiff and one Howell parked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lowe v. the City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Abbott v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Inman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Dysart v. LurtySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Jordan v. NeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith Engineering Works v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Bynum v. Western Surety Co. of Sioux Falls, S.D.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Standard Surety & Cas. Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API