Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Car & Foundry Co. v. Lefebvre

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 29, 1904No. 14,677PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of West Baton Rouge; E. •B. Talbot, Judge. Action by the Chattanooga Car. & Foundry-Company against Victor M. Lefebvre. judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals..

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

This is an action brought by-Henry Clay Evans, doing business under the name of the Chattanooga Car & Foundry Company, for a balance alleged to be due for certain cane cars furnished to Victor M. Lefebvre under the following contract, to wit:

“Chattanooga, Tenn., July 6th, 1901.
“Mr. V. M. Lefebvre, Plaquemine, La.
“Dear Sir. We hereby agree to furnish you-30, double track, skeleton, cane cars, as per the attached specifications, at $145, each, delivered at Australia Plantation. We agree to furnish a man to superintend the putting up of the cars after they are…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Bancroft v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1962
  3. Williams Lumber Co. v. Stewart Gast Bro.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Jones v. WhittingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Stamm-Scheele Mfg. Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API