Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brooks v. Horning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1967Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Herlihy, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I concur with the majority in their determination that Special Term properly granted the respondents’ motion to strike the appellant’s defense of the Statute of Limitations and properly denied the appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. However, for the reasons set forth hereinafter, I would modify the order of Special Term and grant the appellant permission to amend her answer in Action No. 2 so as to set forth therein the prior judgment as a defense. The majority find that in order for res judicata or estoppel to be applicable,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Glaser v. HuetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. Glaser v. HuetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Craig v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API