Legal Opinion

State v. BLACK 1999 LEXUS ES300

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 7, 2011No. 102,286Published

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

After investigating Andrew Wurtz for dealing marijuana, the police seized his 1999 Lexus ES300 and petitioned to forfeit it since he had used it for selling drugs. Wurtz stipulated that the car was properly subject to forfeiture but insisted that the forfeiture be limited in scope under K.S.A. 60-4106(c) because forfeiting the $8,000 car was grossly disproportionate to the $250 he had gained from the two drug sales conducted from the car.

But Wurtz’ argument fails because the inquiry under K.S.A. 60-4106(c) considers all of the circumstances, including related criminal conduct not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. SabhnaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. RiojasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API