Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Smith
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
We hold that, where the legislature has enacted a law of statewide impact on a matter of substantial state concern but has not treated all areas of the state alike, the Home Rule section of the State Constitution does not require an examination into the reasonableness of the distinctions the legislature has made.
I
The Wicks Law, originally enacted in 1912, requires public entities seeking bids on construction contracts to obtain “separate specifications” for three “subdivisions of the work to be *314performed”—generally, plumbing, electrical and HVAC (heating,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Wambat Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Greater New York Taxi Ass'n v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. AubertineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Mangano v. SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Fossella v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Schulz v. State of New York Executive, Andrew Cuomo, GovernorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.