Legal Opinion

Babare v. Rodman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1924No. 18222Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

The judgment in this case consists of two parts: first, the court ordered the return to the respondent of a fish seine, or, in lieu thereof, the payment to the respondent of the seine’s value, fixed at $1,500; second, the payment to the respondent of $1,000, being the reasonable value of the use of the seine for the period of its detention. -

A re-examination by the court En Rano is convincing that the prior decision of the department (Babare v. Rodman, 127 Wash. 436, 221 Pac. 292), in affirming the judgment must be modified.(1) On the question of the value of the seine, there was…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florence Fish Co. v. Everett Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Babare v. RodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API