Legal Opinion

Illinois Cent. Railroad v. Porter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1906PublishedCited by 22 opinions

PROM SHELBY Appeal from the Circuit Court of Shelby County.— WalteR Malone, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The plaintiff below was in the employment of the United States in the capacity of a mail clerk, and,was *15assigned to duty on a fast passenger and mail train known as the “Chicago and New Orleans Limited.” On the 20th of October, 1904, he sustained serious personal injuries in consequence of the derailment of the train at or near the village of Tillatoba, Mississippi. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff below for the sum of $2,500, from which the company appealed and has assigned errors.

The first assignment is that there is no evidence to support the verdict of the jury.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Majestic v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Stem v. Nashville Interurban Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Shea v. RettieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API