Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 11, 2003No. CR. 02-50060PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny Defendant’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 16, 2002, a grand jury charged Defendant, a convicted felon, with two counts of possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On December 19, 2002, Defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence. Defendant moves to suppress the evidence supporting Count II of the indictment only.

In Count II of the indictment, the grand jury…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CoxDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API