Legal Opinion

Tracy v. Juanto

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Lake: J. M. Batchelder, Judge. In Banc. '

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

— This is an action to recover damages for an alleged trespass by defendant’s sheep upon lands to which the plaintiff holds a possessory title. The answer denied that the trespass was committed by defendant’s sheep. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed. There are several assignments of error in the record, but only one of these is' mentioned or discussed in appellant’s brief.

1. Where no argument is presented in appellant’s brief upon an assignment of error, it is deemed to have been abandoned and waived: See Miller Lum. Co. v. Davis, 94 Or. 507, 515 (185 Pac.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haynes v. LeppigMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Donohoe v. Portland Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bartel v. LopeOregon Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Jones Land & Livestock Co. v. SeawellOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Miller Lum. Co. v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bingenheimer Mercantile Co. v. SackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API