Legal Opinion

Webb v. . Atkinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following issues, among others, were submitted to the jury:

1. "Was the said deed for lands from Natt Atkinson to his sons (448) made by him with intent to hinder, delay and defraud his creditors?" Ans.: "Yes."

2. "Did defendants, E. B. and C. B. Atkinson, purchase and take a deed for said Whittier lands from Natt Akinson [Atkinson] for valuable consideration, without notice or knowledge of any fraud?" Ans.: "No."

7. "Has the defendant, H. N. Atkinson, converted to her own use, and does she now wrongfully detain and withhold any other money or funds belonging to the estate of Natt Atkinson?…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Wittkowsky v. WassonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. State v. . SuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Cable v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  2. United States v. HaddockDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1956
  3. First Bank of Maysville v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Scott v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API