Greene v. Davis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Putnam Circuit Court. — Now. George W. Wcmnemaher, Judge. (1) An interplea may be made by answer. Roselle v. Bank, 119 M'o. 84; Sullivan v. Knights of Father Matthew, 73 Mo. App. 43. (2) The amended answer in this case stated a good interplea. Moreover no objection was made to the sufficiency of that answer in the trial court, neither was objection made to the introduction of any evidence under it. Atkinson v. Carter, 101 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Putnam Circuit Court. — Now. George W. Wcmnemaher, Judge. (1) An interplea may be made by answer. Roselle v. Bank, 119 M'o. 84; Sullivan v. Knights of Father Matthew, 73 Mo. App. 43. (2) The amended answer in this case stated a good interplea. Moreover no objection was made to the sufficiency of that answer in the trial court, neither was objection made to the introduction of any evidence under it. Atkinson v. Carter, 101 Mo. App. 477; Woodmen of the World v. Wood, 100 Mo. App. 655; Funk v. Thomasson, 84 Mo: App. 490. (3) The defendant had and claimed to have no defense to the…
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J. —
Action on a promissory note. The amended answer on which the case was tried is in the nature of a bill of interpleader. The issues presented by that answer and plaintiffs’ reply thereto were decided adversely to defendant; judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs on the note and defendant appealed.
On October 20, 1903, defendant executed and delivered to Clara Davis his negotiable promissory note of $400, payable on or before one year after date. Before, maturity the payee sold and transferred it to C. J. Davis and endorsed it as follows: “For value received I assign the within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Groves v. SentellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Marvin v. EllwoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Hathaway v. FoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. MinerUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
- Arn v. ArnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Telle v. RoeverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Butler County Railroad v. BarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Reynolds v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Mutual Aid Union v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923