Legal Opinion

Van Arsdale - Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1916No. 19,900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The Van Arsdale - Osborne Brokerage Company employed A. E. Jones as an agent to solicit fire insurance, under a written contract which among other things provided that he should receive a commission upon the premiums; that where premium notes were given the brokerage company would remit to Jones on the first of the ensuing month the amount of his commissions thereon, but that “in all cases where notes are taken by him for insurance and said notes remain unpaid for six months after due, the commission advanced by said Company shall be refunded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Reed v. Union Central Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. McLain v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Currier v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
  5. Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. RinerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Citizens Farmers Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Oklahoma Industrial Finance Corp. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API