Legal Opinion

Supervisors v. Durant

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 1869PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Iowa. The writ of error in this case, which was a proceeding of the United States ex relatione Durant against the Board of Supervisors of Poweshiek County, Iowa, brought up a petition, on the part of the relator, for an alternative writ of mandamus to the supervisors of the county just named, commanding them to levy a tax sufficient to pay a certain judgment which he held against the county, or show cause for not so doing; the…

Read the full summary

Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Iowa. The writ of error in this case, which was a proceeding of the United States ex relatione Durant against the Board of Supervisors of Poweshiek County, Iowa, brought up a petition, on the part of the relator, for an alternative writ of mandamus to the supervisors of the county just named, commanding them to levy a tax sufficient to pay a certain judgment which he held against the county, or show cause for not so doing; the order for an alternative mandamus, and the issuing of the same; a return demurrer to the return, and an order for…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

subsequently delivered the opinion of the court, to the effect, that as to the entry which the court on motion allowed to be made in the journal nunc pro tunc, as the matter was one which arose from the inadvertence of the clerk, the entry was but common practice and matter of course, and that the amendment to the marshal's return was of daily practice also.

The judgment for the writ of attachment was accordingly

Affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Player's Poker Club, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API