Morris v. State

SAMFORD, Judge.

' This is the second appeal in this case. Morris v. State, ante, p. 156, 142 So. 592.

The facts in this record are materially and substantially different from the facts as they ■appeared in the record on former appeal. In the former appeal the state introduced as a witness in its behalf Henry Ward Holland, who by his testimony admitted the arson so far a-s he was concerned and implicated this defendant as particeps eriminis. The whole ease on former trial revolved around the testimony of Holland and the effort on the part of the state to furnish sufficient corroboration to meet…