Legal Opinion

Murphy v. PHH Mortgage Servicers

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 23, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01552Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Latesha Shanté Murphy, Plaintiff, Civil No. 3:23-cv-01552 (KAD) v. Federal Savings Bank, et al., September 23, 2024 Defendants. RECOMMENDED RULING I. INTRODUCTION This is a lawsuit filed by Latesha Shanté Murphy, proceeding pro se, against Federal Savings Bank (“FSB”) and Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. (“Dovenmuehle”), a mortgage servicer on behalf of FSB. Ms. Murphy apparently contends in her amended complaint that FSB and Dovenmuehle violated both the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”),

15 U.S.C. §§ 1601

et seq., and the Real Estate Settlement…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API